outcome
XM-DAC-41146-SSD_O_2
Increased engagement of partners in support of UN-Women’s mandate
SP O_2.1: Number of initiatives led by UN Women-supported civil society mechanisms (including the civil society advisory groups) towards achieving gender equality and women’s rights
QCPR
4.3.5
SP O_2.2: Percentage of UN Women’s field offices and relevant HQ units that implemented dedicated initiatives to engage with the following non-traditional partners: a) organizations working with men and boys and/or b) faith-based organizations and actors
SP O_2.3: Number of individual commitments made to HeForShe online and offline by men and boys (Not for country reporting)
SP O_2.4: Number of UN Women initiatives that are dedicated to engage youth for gender equality
SP O_2.5: Number of strategic partnerships with the corporate sector, integrating gender equality principles in their core business and/or value chains and at least two types of the following contributions to UN-Women’s mandate: (i) financial; (ii) advocacy and visibility; (iii) expertise and staff time (similar to UNICEF) (Not for country reporting)
SP O_2.6: Percentage of new Regional and Country Strategic Notes with a dedicated partnerships strategy (Not for country reporting)
QCPR
1.4.25
2022
Baseline
(i) 0, (ii) 0, (iii) 0
(i) 0, (ii) 0, (iii) 0
SP O_2.7: Number of media outlets that sign up to the Step it Up Media Compact (Not for country reporting)
SP O_2.8: Number of visitors to the UN Women global website (Not for country reporting)
SP O_2.9: Number of followers of UN-Women on social media (Not for country reporting)
SP O_2.10: Number of mentions of UN-Women in the media (Not for country reporting)
SP O_2.11: Amount of total regular core resources and total non-core other resources from: -> public partners -> private sector partners, including National Committees and individuals(similar to UNICEF)(Derived from QCPR indicator 20a)(Not for country reporting)
SP O_2.12: Contributions by donors other than the top 15 (Shared with UNFPA and UNICEF)(Not for country reporting)
SP O_2.13: Contributions received through pooled and thematic funding mechanisms (Derived from QCPR indicators 15d and 15f)(Shared with UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
Number of cross-regional knowledge exchange initiatives which promote innovative ways of working / promising practices (CO, RO, HQ)
output
SSD_O_2.2
UN Women is a recognized hub of knowledge on achieving gender equality and women’s empowerment at country level
# of national gender equality profiles created, based on gender data sets available
# of countries exchanging Gender equality knowledge and expertise with South Sudan (including through South-South or Triangular cooperation)
# of new knowledge products developed and disseminated through all mediums
output
SSD_O_2.3
Effective partnerships between UN Women and major stakeholders, including civil society, private sector, Regional and international organizations
# of meetings held with Civil Society Advisory Group (CSAG) members
# of partnerships with civil society contributing to UN Women’s programmes including strengthened collective advocacy and/or access to advisory support on gender equality and women empowerment (GEWE)
output
SSD_O_2.4
Resource base is expanded and diversified to meet the demand for UN Women catalytic and technical support and strategic grant-making
Amount of total (non-core) raised from public and private sector partners
# of increased multi-year contributions
2019
Milestone
2/DRF Outcome
2/DRF Outcome
output
SSD_O_2.5
UN Women’s Communications capacity and systems strengthened to provide tools and information for effective advocacy of its programme in South Sudan, and gender equality and women empowerment (GEWE) overall
# of country-level media coverage of UN Women’s work
UN Women South Sudan advocacy and Communications Strategies rolled out
outcome
XM-DAC-41146-SSD_O_3
High quality of programmes through knowledge, innovation, results-based management and evaluation
SP O_3.1: Number of initiatives implemented in partnership with the private sector to scale up innovations that address the challenges faced by women and girls (Not for country reporting)
SP O_3.2: Number of UN-Women offices and units that pilot or scale up digital innovations (Not for country reporting)
SP O_3.3: Percentage of UN-Women field offices indicating that UN-Women has undertaken activities in the country to support south-south, north-south or triangular cooperation (Derived from QCPR indicator 43d) (Similar to UNICEF)
SP O_3.4: Number of countries that have a UN-Women-led national gender equality profile based on gender data sets available, disaggregated by relevant characteristics
SP O_3.5: Number of participants trained on gender-equality related topics via the Training Centre, disaggregated by sex and type of organization (Not for country reporting)
SP O_3.6: Number of thematic communities of practice with systems for capturing, storing and sharing knowledge
SP O_3.7: a. Number of citations of UN-Women’s global reports (Progress of the World ‘s Women, World Survey on the Role of Women in Development, SDGs and Gender Report) (Not for country reporting)
QCPR
3.5.10
SP O_3.7: b. Number of downloads of UN-Women’s knowledge products (Not for country reporting)
SP O_3.8: Percentage of Strategic Notes and Annual Reports that meet quality standards in results-based management (Not for country reporting)
SP O_3.9: Percentage of programme staff trained on results based management (Not for country reporting)
SP O_3.10: Percentage of planned evaluations being conducted (Similar to UNICEF and UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
SP O_3.11: Percentage of evaluations rated “good and above” (Similar to UNICEF and UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
SP_O_5B
UN Women reports on this indicator in a global scope, signified by "(Desk Review)" at the end of the indicator statement (see the Our Global Results page for the global result)
Percentage of evaluations rated “good and above” (Desk Review)
Percentage of (i) joint evaluations; (ii) independent system-wide evaluations in which UN-Women engaged (QCPR 5.4.3) (Desk Review)
QCPR
5.4.3
output
SSD_O_3.4
UN Women practices and promotes results-based management with partners
% of programmes and reports including implementation partners’ showing gender disaggregated data
% of programme staff trained on results based management (RBM) and on corporate RBM, monitoring tools and other corporate tools (e.g. RMS/LEADS/DAMS/ATLAS)
output
SSD_O_3.5
A clear evidence base for gender responsive programming is created through high quality evaluations of Strategic Note and United Nations Cooperation Framework (UNCF) implementation for learning, decision-making and accountability
# of completed evaluations rated as satisfactory and above
# of UNCF evaluations reflecting gender equality and women empowerment (GEWE) analysis
# of completed evaluation rated as satisfactory and above
# of UNCF evaluations reflecting gender equality and women empowerment (GEWE) analysis
outcome
XM-DAC-41146-SSD_O_4
Improved management of financial and human resources in pursuit of results
Implementation rate for regular resources (Desk Review)
Implementation rate for other resources (Desk Review)
SP O_4.1 : Rating in the Aid Transparency Tracker (Derived from QCPR indicator 25) (Shared with UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
SP O_4.2: Percentage of donor reports submitted on time (Not for country reporting)
SP O_4.3: Percentage of feedback received from member states on donor reports that are positive (Not for country reporting)
SP O_4.4: Percentage of Country and Multi-Country Offices that have adopted and implemented common service lines in: i.Common procurement services ii. Common finance services iii. Common information, communication and technology (ICT) services iv. Common logistics services v.Common human resources services vi. Common facility services, including Common Premises (Derived from QCPR indicator 76c)(Similar to UNICEF and UNFPA)
SP O_4.5: Structured dialogue on financing with the Executive Board held annually (Derived from QCPR indicator 19)(Not for country reporting)
SP O_4.6: Percentage of offices which have completed training on anti-fraud and accountability (Not for country reporting)
SP O_4.7: Implementation rate for regular resources (Shared with UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
QCPR
1.4.28
SP O_4.8: Implementation rate for other resources (Not for country reporting)
SP O_4.9: Percentage of Country Offices reporting on Greenhouse Gas emissions for travel and operations (Similar to UNFPA and UNICEF) (Not for country reporting)
SP O_4.10: Average turnover time for the identification of qualified candidates and complete recruitment (Not for country reporting)
SP O_4.11: Percentage of annual performance management and development reviews completed on time (Not for country reporting)
SP O_4.12: Percentage of staff members completing mandatory trainings (Not for country reporting)
SP O_4.13: Percentage of internal audit recommendations implemented (Similar to UNFPA)
(Not for country reporting)
SP O_4.14: Percentage of external audit recommendations implemented (Similar to UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
SP O_4.15: Percentage of risk units meeting Enterprise Risk Management policy and framework requirements (Not for country reporting)
SP O_4.16: Percentage availability and uptime of corporate ICT systems (Not for country reporting)
SP O_4.17: Percentage of ICT platforms that fully address cyber-security issues and architecture design inputs from the ICT team (Not for country reporting)
SP O_4.18: Percentage of offices compliant with business continuity plans and processes (Not for country reporting)
SP O_4.19: Percentage of offices compliant with UN Security Risk Management requirements (Not for country reporting)
output
SSD_O_4.1
Improved stewardship of resources (human, financial and material)
Percentage spending per delivery reports and One App tools compliance
Number of staff development training undertaken by staff members.
Number of quarterly and annual monitoring reports completed per year
output
SSD_O_4.2
Effective leadership, staff profile, and direction to advance the mandate and mission of UN Women in South Sudan
Tracking tool for Audit Recommendations
Reduction of average time for recruitment
2018
Baseline
12 weeks
12 weeks
2019
Milestone
10 weeks
10 weeks
2020
Milestone
9 weeks
9 weeks
2021
Milestone
8 weeks
8 weeks
Office and attached temporary/guest housing facility fully constructed and furnished
output
SSD_O_4.3
UN Women staff have the capacity and accountability for delivering results
% of implementation for Core resources
2019
Milestone
35% at midterm, 90% at year end
35% at midterm, 90% at year end
2020
Milestone
35% at midterm, 90% at year end
35% at midterm, 90% at year end
2021
Milestone
35% at midterm, 90% at year end
35% at midterm, 90% at year end
2022
Target
35% at midterm, 90% at year end
35% at midterm, 90% at year end
% of implementation for non-core resources
2019
Milestone
35% at midterm, 90% at yearend
35% at midterm, 90% at yearend
2020
Milestone
35% at midterm, 90% at year end
35% at midterm, 90% at year end
2021
Milestone
35% at midterm, 90% at year end
35% at midterm, 90% at year end
2022
Target
35% at midterm, 90% at year end
35% at midterm, 90% at year end
% of total core expenditures directed to program expenditure vs. non-core expenditure [QCPR]
2019
Milestone
20% core vs 80% non-core
20% core vs 80% non-core
2020
Milestone
25% core vs 75% non-core
25% core vs 75% non-core
2021
Milestone
30% core vs 70% non-core
30% core vs 70% non-core
2022
Target
30% core vs 70% non-core
30% core vs 70% non-core
output
SSD_O_4.4
UN Women promotes a culture of risk management, accountability, harmonization of business practices and transparency in its operations
% of Internal Control Framework (ICF) implemented to implement effective internal controls
% of implementation of external audit recommendations by target completion dates
% of compliance of all UN Women operations with UN Security Management System
# of joint meetings of operation and programme to simplify and harmonize internal programming process
Common services on risk management to staff in place [Training on security measures, protection against sexual exploitation and abuse, workplace harassment, business continuity planning and risk management plan](QCPR)
% of staff and consultants are properly supported with security equipment and communications
Overall Information Security & Compliance Risk Level