High quality of programs through knowledge, innovation, results-based management and evaluation
SP O_3.1: Number of initiatives implemented in partnership with the private sector to scale up innovations that address the challenges faced by women and girls (Not for country reporting)
SP O_3.2: Number of UN-Women offices and units that pilot or scale up digital innovations (Not for country reporting)
SP O_3.3: Percentage of UN-Women field offices indicating that UN-Women has undertaken activities in the country to support south-south, north-south or triangular cooperation (Derived from QCPR indicator 43d) (Similar to UNICEF)
SP O_3.4: Number of countries that have a UN-Women-led national gender equality profile based on gender data sets available, disaggregated by relevant characteristics
SP O_3.5: Number of participants trained on gender-equality related topics via the Training Centre, disaggregated by sex and type of organization (Not for country reporting)
SP O_3.6: Number of thematic communities of practice with systems for capturing, storing and sharing knowledge
SP O_3.7: a. Number of citations of UN-Women’s global reports (Progress of the World ‘s Women, World Survey on the Role of Women in Development, SDGs and Gender Report) (Not for country reporting)
QCPR
3.5.10
SP O_3.7: b. Number of downloads of UN-Women’s knowledge products (Not for country reporting)
SP O_3.8: Percentage of Strategic Notes and Annual Reports that meet quality standards in results-based management (Not for country reporting)
SP O_3.9: Percentage of programme staff trained on results based management (Not for country reporting)
SP O_3.10: Percentage of planned evaluations being conducted (Similar to UNICEF and UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
SP O_3.11: Percentage of evaluations rated “good and above” (Similar to UNICEF and UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
SP_O_5B
UN Women reports on this indicator in a global scope, signified by "(Desk Review)" at the end of the indicator statement (see the Our Global Results page for the global result)
Percentage of evaluations rated “good and above” (Desk Review)
output
LBN_O_3.1
UN Women practices RBM for informing programming and decision making
2017
Baseline
3 million
3 million
2019
Result
Medium 30-69%
Medium 30-69%
2021
Milestone
12 Reports
12 Reports
Number of monitoring field visits conducted to assess the implementation progress of respective programs.
Timely Quarterly and Annual UNW reporting conducted through RMS
2021
Target
15 for 3 programmes
15 for 3 programmes
output
LBN_O_3.3
Lessons learned and recommendations are generated from high quality evaluations of Strategic Note implementation for strategic decision-making and accountability
MERP tracking matrix updated regularly on a quarterly basis
2019
Result
Medium 30-69%
Medium 30-69%
Percentage of planned evaluations conducted in the SN portfolio (2019-2021)
Number of evaluations rated satisfactory or above