Skip to main content
Region:Asia Pacific Current UN Women Plan Period Afghanisthan:2018-2022
i-icon World Bank Income Classification:Low Income The World Bank classifies economies for analytical purposes into four income groups: low, lower-middle, upper-middle, and high income. For this purpose it uses gross national income (GNI) per capita data in U.S. dollars, converted from local currency using the World Bank Atlas method, which is applied to smooth exchange rate fluctuations. i-icon Least Developed Country:Yes Since 1971, the United Nations has recognized LDCs as a category of States that are deemed highly disadvantaged in their development process, for structural, historical and also geographical reasons. Three criteria are used: per capita income, human assets, and economic vulnerability. i-icon Gender Inequality Index:0.575 GII is a composite metric of gender inequality using three dimensions: reproductive health, empowerment and the labour market. A low GII value indicates low inequality between women and men, and vice-versa. i-icon Gender Development Index:0.723 GDI measures gender inequalities in achievement in three basic dimensions of human development: health, education, and command over economic resources.
i-icon Population:209,497,025 Source of population data: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2022). World Population Prospects: The 2022 Revision Male:19,976,265 (9.5%) Female:189,520,760 (90.5%)
Map Summary
Summary
Disclaimer
Country
Year
OVERVIEWRESULTS & RESOURCESOUR PROGRESSSTRATEGIC PLAN CONTRIBUTIONS
return-to-previous
outcome ECA_O_5XM-DAC-41146-ECA_O_5

Effective normative, programmatic and coordination products, services and processes.

Activity Details Resources Outcome Indicators and Results Strategic Note Outcome Progress Note Documents
Outcome details
SDG alignment
Impact areas
Impact areas
Products, services and processes
Organizational outputs
Policy marker GENDER EQUALITY
Humanitarian scope No
UN system function Direct support and service delivery Integrated policy advice and thought leadership Intergovernmental Normative Support Support functions
Outcome Description

Effective normative, programmatic and coordination products, services and processes.

Resources
$157.96 K Planned Budget
$105.39 K Actual Budget
$157.96 K Planned Budget
$105.39 K Actual Budget and Shortfall
$72.98 K Expenses
Funding Partners Regular Resources (Core):
UN_Women_English
UN Women $105,389
Outcome Indicator and Results Plan Period : 2022-2025
OUTCOME ECA_O_5

Effective normative, programmatic and coordination products, services and processes.

SP_O_5A

UN Women reports on this indicator in a global scope, signified by "(Desk Review)" at the end of the indicator statement (see the Our Global Results page for the global result)

SP_O_5A
Country
Percentage of non-core funding that is directly applied towards the Strategic Note (Desk Review)
2022 Result N/A
SP_O_5A
Country
Baseline
- -
2023
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2024
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2025
Target
- -
Result
- -
SP_O_5B

UN Women reports on this indicator in a global scope, signified by "(Desk Review)" at the end of the indicator statement (see the Our Global Results page for the global result)

SP_O_5B
Country
Percentage of evaluations rated “good and above” (Desk Review)
2022 Result -
SP_O_5B
Country
Baseline
- -
2022
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2023
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2024
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2025
Target
- -
Result
- -
SP_O_5C
SP_O_5C
Country
Percentage all country office, regional office and HQ units' using signature interventions for programming (Desk Review)
2022 Result N/A
SP_O_5C
Country
Baseline
- -
2023
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2024
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2025
Target
- -
Result
- -
SP_O_5F

UN Women reports on this indicator in a global scope, signified by "(Desk Review)" at the end of the indicator statement (see the Our Global Results page for the global result)

SP_O_5F
Country
Number of (i) joint evaluations; (ii) independent system-wide evaluations (QCPR 5.4.3) (Desk Review)
QCPR 5.4.3
2022 Result -
SP_O_5F
Country
Baseline
- -
2022
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2023
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2024
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2025
Target
- -
Result
- -
Click here to view the progress
Output Indicator and Results
OUTPUT ECA_O_5.1

A clear evidence base is generated from high quality evaluations for learning, decision-making and accountability in the ECA Region.

Planned Budget: $129.50 K
Actual Budget and Shortfall: $35.00 K
Expenses: $12.15 K
ECA_O_5.1A
ECA_O_5.1A
Country
Number of Regional programmatic level evaluations conducted in the SN period
2022 Result 2
ECA_O_5.1A
Country
2021
Baseline
2 2
2022
Milestone
- -
Result
2 2
2023
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2024
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2025
Target
5 5
Result
- -
ECA_O_5.1B
ECA_O_5.1B
Country
Number of Regional strategic level evaluations conducted in the SN Period
2022 Result 1
ECA_O_5.1B
Country
2021
Baseline
0 0
2022
Milestone
- -
Result
1 1
2023
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2024
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2025
Target
2 2
Result
- -
ECA_O_5.1C
ECA_O_5.1C
Country
Number of ECA Country Offices personnel trained on evaluation
2022 Result 3
ECA_O_5.1C
Country
2021
Baseline
4 4
2022
Milestone
- -
Result
3 3
2023
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2024
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2025
Target
9 9
Result
- -
OUTPUT ECA_O_5.2

Strengthened capacity on programme/project management and oversight

Planned Budget: $147.74 K
Actual Budget and Shortfall: $24.51 K
Expenses: $14.95 K
ECA_O_5.2A
ECA_O_5.2A
Country
Number of ECA personnel trained on results-based programme/project management
2022 Result 104
ECA_O_5.2A
Country
2021
Baseline
20 20
2022
Milestone
25 25
Result
104 104
2023
Milestone
25 25
Result
- -
2024
Milestone
25 25
Result
- -
2025
Target
25 25
Result
- -
OUTPUT ECA_O_5.3

Country Offices and the RO produce timely and high quality Strategic Notes, Work Plans and annual reports

Planned Budget: $107.86 K
Actual Budget and Shortfall: $40.83 K
Expenses: $40.83 K
ECA_O_5.3A
ECA_O_5.3A
Country
Percentage of new Strategic Notes in ECA region rated as "excellent" quality
2022 Result 100
ECA_O_5.3A
Country
2018
Baseline
57 57
2022
Milestone
75 75
Result
100 100
2023
Milestone
75 75
Result
- -
2024
Milestone
N/A N/A
Result
- -
2025
Target
N/A N/A
Result
- -
ECA_O_5.3B
ECA_O_5.3B
Country
Percentage of Annual Reports in the ECA region rated as "excellent" quality
2022 Result 100
ECA_O_5.3B
Country
2018
Baseline
79 79
2022
Milestone
80 80
Result
100 100
2023
Milestone
80 80
Result
- -
2024
Milestone
80 80
Result
- -
2025
Target
80 80
Result
- -
ECA_O_5.3C
ECA_O_5.3C
Country
Percentage of Work Plans in the ECA region meeting corporate requirements
2022 Result 100
ECA_O_5.3C
Country
2021
Baseline
75 75
2022
Milestone
100 100
Result
100 100
2023
Milestone
100 100
Result
- -
2024
Milestone
100 100
Result
- -
2025
Target
100 100
Result
- -
ECA_O_5.3D
ECA_O_5.3D
Country
Percentage of offices rating ECARO's strategic planning support as satisfactory or higher
2022 Result 100
ECA_O_5.3D
Country
2021
Baseline
TBC TBC
2022
Milestone
80 80
Result
100 100
2023
Milestone
80 80
Result
- -
2024
Milestone
80 80
Result
- -
2025
Target
80 80
Result
- -
ECA_O_5.3E
ECA_O_5.3E
Country
Percentage of offices rating ECARO's reporting support as satisfactory or higher
2022 Result 100
ECA_O_5.3E
Country
2021
Baseline
TBC TBC
2022
Milestone
80 80
Result
100 100
2023
Milestone
80 80
Result
- -
2024
Milestone
80 80
Result
- -
2025
Target
80 80
Result
- -
OUTPUT ECA_O_5.4

UN Women monitoring capacity across the region is strengthened in line with RBM standards

Planned Budget: $45.01 K
Actual Budget and Shortfall: $5.06 K
Expenses: $5.06 K
ECA_O_5.4A
ECA_O_5.4A
Country
Number of staff from Country Offices and the Regional Office completing basic refresher training on RBM
2022 Result 72
ECA_O_5.4A
Country
2021
Baseline
30 30
2022
Milestone
50 50
Result
72 72
2023
Milestone
50 50
Result
- -
2024
Milestone
50 50
Result
- -
2025
Target
50 50
Result
- -
ECA_O_5.4B
ECA_O_5.4B
Country
Number of staff from Country Offices and the Regional Office trained as trainers on RBM
2022 Result 60
ECA_O_5.4B
Country
2021
Baseline
0 0
2022
Milestone
25 25
Result
60 60
2023
Milestone
N/A N/A
Result
- -
2024
Milestone
N/A N/A
Result
- -
2025
Target
N/A N/A
Result
- -
ECA_O_5.4C
ECA_O_5.4C
Country
Percentage of staff trained as RBM trainers who deliver RBM training to CO staff or local partners
2022 Result 50
ECA_O_5.4C
Country
2021
Baseline
0 0
2022
Milestone
50 50
Result
50 50
2023
Milestone
50 50
Result
- -
2024
Milestone
50 50
Result
- -
2025
Target
50 50
Result
- -
Strategic Note Outcome Progress Note Showing data of : 2022

Effective normative, programmatic and coordination products, services and processes.

All normative, programmatic and coordination products and processes improved in 2022. Moldova, Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine submitted t hree new , t op quality Strategic Notes (SNs) in a timely manner. To st r eamline the processes, ECARO combined RO & HQ technical reviews in one meeting and also introduced 'peer review' into the process to cultivate an exchange of experience and learning. All field office annual reports for 2021 were drafted, reviewed and finalized with detailed quality assurance by ECA RO. Mor eo ver , ECARO took a very active role and engaged all levels of the process for one-time course correction of the SP indicators which leads the organization for a more accurate and result focused reporting. Under various programme and projects, many knowledge products were produced which contributed to the Community of Practice exercises both at the regional and corporate levels. UNW's coordination mandate has been strengthened further both at regional and field levels through Issue-based Coalition on Gender Equality, close cooperation with Gender Theme Groups as well UNW's engagement with UNSDCF development processes.
Documents
Title
Categories
Download
Strategic Note (SN) Development Results and Resources Framework
Intended ultimate beneficiaries, Conditions, Budget, Results, outcomes and outputs
Download
Disclaimer and notes
The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
References to Kosovo shall be understood to be in the context of United Nations Security Council resolution 1244 (1999).
Download Data
CSV PDF