Skip to main content
Region:Asia Pacific Current UN Women Plan Period Afghanisthan:2018-2022
i-icon World Bank Income Classification:Low Income The World Bank classifies economies for analytical purposes into four income groups: low, lower-middle, upper-middle, and high income. For this purpose it uses gross national income (GNI) per capita data in U.S. dollars, converted from local currency using the World Bank Atlas method, which is applied to smooth exchange rate fluctuations. i-icon Least Developed Country:Yes Since 1971, the United Nations has recognized LDCs as a category of States that are deemed highly disadvantaged in their development process, for structural, historical and also geographical reasons. Three criteria are used: per capita income, human assets, and economic vulnerability. i-icon Gender Inequality Index:0.575 GII is a composite metric of gender inequality using three dimensions: reproductive health, empowerment and the labour market. A low GII value indicates low inequality between women and men, and vice-versa. i-icon Gender Development Index:0.723 GDI measures gender inequalities in achievement in three basic dimensions of human development: health, education, and command over economic resources.
i-icon Population:209,497,025 Source of population data: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2022). World Population Prospects: The 2022 Revision Male:19,976,265 (9.5%) Female:189,520,760 (90.5%)
Map Summary
Summary
Disclaimer
Country
Year
OVERVIEWRESULTS & RESOURCESOUR PROGRESSSTRATEGIC PLAN CONTRIBUTIONS
outcome FIJ_D_6.1XM-DAC-41146-FIJ_D_6.1

Global normative and policy frameworks for gender equality and women’s empowerment are implemented in the Pacific

Activity Details Resources Outcome Indicators and Results Strategic Note Outcome Progress Note Documents
Outcome details
SDG alignment
SDG Goal
Impact areas
Impact areas
Governance and participation in public life
Organizational outputs
Organizational outputs
Norms, laws, policies and institutions
Policy marker GENDER EQUALITY
Humanitarian scope No
UN system function Advocacy, communications and social mobilization Capacity development and technical assistance Intergovernmental Normative Support
Outcome Description

Supporting Pacific island nations to implement normative and policy frameworks for GEWE

UN Partners
UN Partner
UNDP
Resources
$231.01 K Planned Budget
$0.00 Actual Budget
$231.01 K Planned Budget
Outcome Indicator and Results Plan Period : 2018-2022
OUTCOME FIJ_D_6.1

Global normative and policy frameworks for gender equality and women’s empowerment are implemented in the Pacific

FIJ_D_6.1A
Number of PICTs where CSOs have submitted CEDAW shadow reports with support UN Women’s support
2022 Result 0
2017
Baseline
6 6
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
1 1
2019
Milestone
6 6
Result
2 2
2020
Milestone
6 6
Result
0 0
2021
Milestone
6 6
Result
0 0
2022
Target
6 6
Result
0 0
SP_D_0.1.2

UN Women reports on this indicator in a global scope, signified by "(Desk Review)" at the end of the indicator statement (see the Our Global Results page for the global result)

Percentage of recommendations in the Secretary-General’s report on the priority theme of the Commission on the Status of Women that are reflected in the agreed conclusions of CSW (Desk Review)
2022 Result -
0
Baseline
- -
2022
Target
- -
Result
- -
SP_D_1.1

UN Women reports on this indicator in a global scope, signified by "(Desk Review)" at the end of the indicator statement (see the Our Global Results page for the global result)

SDG 5.5.1: Proportion of seats held by women in (a) national parliaments, (b) local governments and (c) executive positions/ministers (cabinets) held by women (Desk Review)
SDG
sdg
Goal 5

Common indicators are those that appear verbatim the same in at least two entities' results frameworks and are drawn, where possible, directly from other globally agreed frameworks.

Common
sdg
UNDP
2022 Result -
0
Baseline
- -
2022
Target
- -
Result
- -
SP_D_2.3A
SP 3.10.1: Number of new and/or improved gender-responsive policies on land developed and/or being implemented with the support of UN-Women
2022 Result N/A
0
Baseline
- -
2021
Target
- -
Result
- -
SP_D_2.3B
SP 3.10.2: Number of rural women supported to gain access, use and/or control of productive resources by UN-Women
2022 Result N/A
0
Baseline
- -
2021
Target
- -
Result
- -
SP_D_2.3C
SP 3.10.3: Number of countries that use the Buy from Women Platform to connect women farmers to information, markets and/or finance (info might still be collected through RMS)
2022 Result N/A
0
Baseline
- -
2021
Target
- -
Result
- -
SP_D_6.1A
SP 1.1.1: Number of countries supported by UN-Women to contribute to the review theme of the Commission on the Status of Women through voluntary national presentations(Not for country reporting)
2022 Result -
2018
Baseline
0 0
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2019
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2020
Milestone
0 0
Result
- -
2021
Milestone
0 0
Result
- -
2022
Target
0 0
Result
- -
SP_D_6.1B
SP 1.1.2: Percentage of Member States expressing satisfaction with the support provided by UN-Women for the annual session of the Commission on the Status of Women(Not for country reporting)
2022 Result -
2018
Baseline
0% 0%
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2019
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2020
Milestone
0% 0%
Result
- -
2021
Milestone
0% 0%
Result
- -
2022
Target
0% 0%
Result
- -
SP_D_6.1C
SP 1.1.3: Number of countries supported by UN-Women that undertake a 25-year review and appraisal of the implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action(Not for country reporting)
2022 Result -
2018
Baseline
0 0
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2019
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2020
Milestone
0 0
Result
- -
2021
Milestone
0 0
Result
- -
2022
Target
0 0
Result
- -
SP_D_6.1D
SP 1.1.4: Percentage of UN Country Teams' CEDAW reports submitted with UN-Women's support (Not for country reporting)
2022 Result -
2018
Baseline
0% 0%
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2019
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2020
Milestone
0% 0%
Result
- -
2021
Milestone
0% 0%
Result
- -
2022
Target
0% 0%
Result
- -
Output Indicator and Results
OUTPUT FIJ_D_6.1.1

Governments and stakeholders have increased capacity to assess progress in implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action and other global normative and policy frameworks for gender equality and the empowerment of all women

Planned Budget: $1.53 M
Actual Budget and Shortfall: $19.08 K
Expenses: $30.32 K
FIJ_D_6.1.1A
Number of PICTs where CSOs have submitted CEDAW shadow reports with support UN Women’s support
2022 Result 0
2017
Baseline
6 6
2018
Milestone
6 6
Result
2 2
2019
Milestone
6 6
Result
0 0
2020
Milestone
6 6
Result
0 0
2021
Milestone
6 6
Result
0 0
2022
Target
6 6
Result
0 0
FIJ_D_6.1.1B
Number of countries supported by UN-Women that undertake a 25-year review and appraisal of the implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action.
2022 Result 1
2017
Baseline
0 0
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
0 0
2019
Milestone
2 2
Result
1 1
2020
Milestone
6 6
Result
0 0
2021
Milestone
6 6
Result
1 1
2022
Target
8 8
Result
1 1
FIJ_D_6.1.1C
Number of countries supported by UN Women that undertake a 25-year review and appraisal of the implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action.
2022 Result 13
2017
Baseline
0 0
2019
Milestone
6 6
Result
13 13
2020
Milestone
5 5
Result
13 13
2021
Milestone
8 8
Result
14 14
2022
Target
13 13
Result
13 13
SP_D_0.1.a
Number of governments that undertake national review processes in response to global intergovernmental outcomes (CO)
2022 Result FALSE
2021
Baseline
TBD TBD
2022
Target
TBD TBD
Result
FALSE FALSE
SP_D_0.1.b

UN Women reports on this indicator in a global scope, signified by "(Desk Review)" at the end of the indicator statement (see the Our Global Results page for the global result)

Percentage of UN Country Teams reports to the CEDAW Committee submitted (Desk Review)
2022 Result -
0
Baseline
- -
2022
Target
- -
Result
- -
Strategic Note Outcome Progress Note Showing data of : 2022

Global normative and policy frameworks for gender equality and women’s empowerment are implemented in the Pacific

Ensuring global normative and policy frameworks for GE/WE are implemented in the Pacific is a priority for the Fiji MCO. There has been siginificant progress made during 2022. The Fiji MCO has coordinated with the Gender Technical Working Group - GTWG - (UN Women, UNFPA, Pacific Community, Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat, and civil society) to ensure that Pacific governments are prepared to engage substantively in the CSW and that work around CSW, the Triennial Conference for Pacific Women, the Pacific Islands Forum Women Leaders' Meeting, and other regional and global mechanisms for GE/WE are aligned. In 2022 the GTWG supported teleconferences in the lead up to CSW66 to build capacity of Member States on CSW negotiations and to raise awareness of the priority theme. Efforts were made to link the CSW66 and COP processes, which resulted in stronger collaborations between intergovernmental organizations towards both intergovernmental processes. The GTWG provided technical support towards the development of a gender and climate change policty brief ahead of the COP in Egypt. Agreed conclusions from the CSW66 were used in the development of this brief as well as in the development of a COP side event on gender and climate change. Addtionally, mometum on CEDAW reporting has increased with more Pacific Islands countries. Vanuatu, Cook Islands, Marhsall Islands and Federated States of Micronesia have expressed interest to commence with their delayed CEDAW reports. This was a key outcome from the Regional CEDAW learnng exchange with 100 Pacific delegates from 10 Pacific Island Governments nowe having increased capacities and knowledge of CEDAW Reporting process including the recently adopted simplified reporting procedures. The CEDAW Learning Exchange workshop enabled Pacific Government to reflect, share and provide guidance, as well as to strengthen Pacific Island governments’ capacity, for the reporting and implementation of CEDAW working towards improving the status of women and girls in the region. Another form of support provded through normative work is support to Fiji government on Fiji Country Gender Assessment. The Ministry of Women, Children and Poverty Alleviation (MWCPA) in Fiji has successfully led ground-breaking work on developing the most up-to-date Fiji Country Gender Assessment (FCGA) which looks at over 9 thematic areas in its assessment of the progress, gaps, challenges, and recommendation for advancement of gender equality in the country. This evidence-based resource will increase the capacity of MWCPA to effectively assess progress against regional and international frameworks including SDGs, Beijing Platform for Action, CEDAW as well as the Pacific Leaders Gender Equality Declaration (PLGED).
Documents
Title
Categories
Download
Strategic Note (SN) Development Results and Resources Framework
Intended ultimate beneficiaries, Conditions, Budget, Results, outcomes and outputs
Disclaimer and notes
The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
References to Kosovo shall be understood to be in the context of United Nations Security Council resolution 1244 (1999).
Download Data
Feedback

We are trying to make this portal very useful and would really love your input. Could you take a few minutes to answer a few questions?

We really appreciate you sharing your feedback

Form

User survey – Welcome to the conversation!

Here at UN Women, we are passionate about making the Transparency Portal not just a tool, but a resource that truly resonates with your needs. This is where you come in! Your insights and experiences are the compass that guides its future development.

Could we borrow a moment of your time? Just a few minutes to dive into a couple of questions could make a world of difference. And – let us know what ideas you have for the Transparency Portal. Which features spark your interest? What improvements are you craving to see?

Your voice is crucial in this journey of growth and improvement. Thank you for being a pivotal part of our community. We are all ears and cannot wait to hear your thoughts and suggestions!

What type of institution do you identify with? Please select one.
Question 01