Outcome summary
Productivity of women in the agricultural value-chain increased
Outcome resources
Outcome and output results
Common indicators are those that appear verbatim the same in at least two entities' results frameworks and are drawn, where possible, directly from other globally agreed frameworks.
CommonComplementary indicators are identified as those in the results framework that are not repeated verbatim in the results framework of another United Nations entity, but are related or provide different but complementary lenses or insights into the same issue, high-level result and/or area of complementary work, such as a Sustainable Development Goal target.
ComplementaryCommon indicators are those that appear verbatim the same in at least two entities' results frameworks and are drawn, where possible, directly from other globally agreed frameworks.
CommonCommon indicators are those that appear verbatim the same in at least two entities' results frameworks and are drawn, where possible, directly from other globally agreed frameworks.
CommonComplementary indicators are identified as those in the results framework that are not repeated verbatim in the results framework of another United Nations entity, but are related or provide different but complementary lenses or insights into the same issue, high-level result and/or area of complementary work, such as a Sustainable Development Goal target.
ComplementaryCommon indicators are those that appear verbatim the same in at least two entities' results frameworks and are drawn, where possible, directly from other globally agreed frameworks.
CommonComplementary indicators are identified as those in the results framework that are not repeated verbatim in the results framework of another United Nations entity, but are related or provide different but complementary lenses or insights into the same issue, high-level result and/or area of complementary work, such as a Sustainable Development Goal target.
ComplementaryComplementary indicators are identified as those in the results framework that are not repeated verbatim in the results framework of another United Nations entity, but are related or provide different but complementary lenses or insights into the same issue, high-level result and/or area of complementary work, such as a Sustainable Development Goal target.
ComplementaryComplementary indicators are identified as those in the results framework that are not repeated verbatim in the results framework of another United Nations entity, but are related or provide different but complementary lenses or insights into the same issue, high-level result and/or area of complementary work, such as a Sustainable Development Goal target.
ComplementaryComplementary indicators are identified as those in the results framework that are not repeated verbatim in the results framework of another United Nations entity, but are related or provide different but complementary lenses or insights into the same issue, high-level result and/or area of complementary work, such as a Sustainable Development Goal target.
ComplementaryComplementary indicators are identified as those in the results framework that are not repeated verbatim in the results framework of another United Nations entity, but are related or provide different but complementary lenses or insights into the same issue, high-level result and/or area of complementary work, such as a Sustainable Development Goal target.
ComplementaryComplementary indicators are identified as those in the results framework that are not repeated verbatim in the results framework of another United Nations entity, but are related or provide different but complementary lenses or insights into the same issue, high-level result and/or area of complementary work, such as a Sustainable Development Goal target.
ComplementaryComplementary indicators are identified as those in the results framework that are not repeated verbatim in the results framework of another United Nations entity, but are related or provide different but complementary lenses or insights into the same issue, high-level result and/or area of complementary work, such as a Sustainable Development Goal target.
ComplementaryOutcome resources allocated towards SDGs
View SDG data for
Our funding partners contributions
- Chart
- Tabla
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.
2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Finland | --
2022
No data available
|
--
2021
No data available
|
$12,176 2020
FinlandOECD-DAC donor
Total contribution:$12,176
Development:$12,176(100%)
Humanitarian:$0(0%)
|
$159,121 2019
FinlandOECD-DAC donor
Total contribution:$159,121
Development:$159,121(100%)
Humanitarian:$0(0%)
|
Sweden | --
2022
No data available
|
--
2021
No data available
|
--
2020
No data available
|
$59,915 2019
SwedenOECD-DAC donor
Total contribution:$59,915
Development:$59,915(100%)
Humanitarian:$0(0%)
|
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) | $124,765 2022
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)United Nations organization
Total contribution:$124,765
Development:$124,765(100%)
Humanitarian:$0(0%)
|
$19,203 2021
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)United Nations organization
Total contribution:$19,203
Development:$19,203(100%)
Humanitarian:$0(0%)
|
$97,431 2020
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)United Nations organization
Total contribution:$97,431
Development:$97,431(100%)
Humanitarian:$0(0%)
|
$50,000 2019
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)United Nations organization
Total contribution:$50,000
Development:$50,000(100%)
Humanitarian:$0(0%)
|
Republic of Korea (the) | $1,064,417 2022
Republic of Korea (the)OECD-DAC donor
Total contribution:$1,064,417
Development:$1,064,417(100%)
Humanitarian:$0(0%)
|
$1,575,814 2021
Republic of Korea (the)OECD-DAC donor
Total contribution:$1,575,814
Development:$1,575,814(100%)
Humanitarian:$0(0%)
|
$179,993 2020
Republic of Korea (the)OECD-DAC donor
Total contribution:$179,993
Development:$179,993(100%)
Humanitarian:$0(0%)
|
--
2019
No data available
|
Outcome insights and achievements
Outcome progress note for the year
Productivity of women in the agricultural value-chain increased
In 2021, there was increased productivity of women in various agricultural value chains. This was a result of Kenya’s commitment to revitalizing the agriculture sector as it was hit by compounding effects of consecutive below-average rainfall seasons on crop and livestock production, coupled with the protracted effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy. The agricultural sector is the backbone of the economy, contributing approximately 33percent of Kenya’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The agriculture sector employs more than 40percent of the total population and 70percent of the rural population. According to the World Bank, women make up 80percent of Kenya's farmers. In 2020, the Agriculture sector recorded mixed performance. Sector growth decelerated to 5.4percent compared to 3.0percent in 2019. In 2021, the agricultural sector grew by 2.6percent. The overall value of marketed agricultural production increased by 9.3 per cent from KSh 466.3 billion in 2019/2020 to KSh 509.7 billion in 2020/2021 (Economic Survey, 2021). UN Women contributed to the growth through enabling policies and supporting rural women farmers to adopt gender-responsive CSA. Through the Women Economic Empowerment (WEE)-CSA programme, UN Women engaged three county governments in ASAL areas, namely Kitui, Laikipia and West Pokot to strengthen their climate-smart and gender-responsive practices within existing policies, CIDPs and frameworks. The WEE-CSA programme built a strong partnership with the three county governments working with 10 Officers (National government), 110 Officers at the County level and 60 members of the County Assembly to provide linkages to the national government’s guidelines and policies, influence policy, provide extension services and ensure relevant policies are adopted at the county level. 1,428 rural women in the 3 counties are participating actively in agricultural value chains in 2021 for higher incomes. Strengthening and improving the performance of the agricultural sector and enabling the engagement of the poorest and most vulnerable was a prerequisite and a necessary condition by UN Women for achieving recovery and growth in Kenya in 2021 after recent years of drought and slow development.
Productivity of women in the agricultural value-chain increased
Three ASAL counties of Kitui, Laikipia , and West Pokot has made some progress in increasing the productivity of women in select agricultural value chains in 2022. 2,391 beneficiaries (Female: 2,002, Male: 389) adopted 15 CSA technologies and 15 CSA practices on 1,598 hectares of farmland. Additionally, 969 women established agribusinesses in select agricultural value chains in crop and livestock production and apiculture. As such, 419 women from 23 farmer groups aggregated and sold their produce making USD 17,640. Beneficiaries reported improved income, nutrition, and food security at the household level. This was partly attributed to the adoption of appropriate gender-transformative CSA technologies vertical and sunken kitchen gardens and improved locally made multi-use brooders for indigenous chicken production. A 30% increase in agricultural productivity is projected by the end of the project in 2023, due to the adoption of CSA technologies and practices by the beneficiaries. UN Women, in partnership with Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Village enterprise, GROOTS Kenya, Hand-in-Hand Eastern Africa, and Anglican Development Services Eastern (ADSE) contributed to strengthening the existing aggregation and supply chain mechanisms, particularly through linking beneficiary groups to input suppliers (seeds, chicks, pesticides, finance, and machinery), aggregators and buyers of their agricultural products. UN Women also focused on building the capacity of women in gender-responsive agriculture value chains (crops and livestock) as well as in financial literacy to help achieve increased access to markets and information. Additionally, UN Women strengthened the capacity of the target women to produce within the changing climate by training them on leadership, advocacy, and gender dynamics. As a result, the women successfully advocated and influenced the inclusion of gender-responsive CSA into county-integrated development plans (CIDPs III). For instance, Laikipia County increased budget allocation for gender and social protection by 4%. The other two counties have also integrated women, youth and PWD focused interventions in their CIDPs. Lessons Learned: There is a need to take a holistic and value-chain approach to increase the productivity of women and youth in agriculture. In addition to strengthening the capacity of women and youth as agricultural producers, efforts should also be made to increase their participation in other agricultural value-chain nodes e.g., value-addition and agro-processing, etc. More efforts should be put into interventions that promote women’s access to credit and markets and linkage made to existing government affirmative procurement and fund programmes e.g., Access to Government Procurement Opportunities (AGPO), National Government Affirmative Action Fund (NGAAF) etc.
Strategic plan contributions
- Impact areas
- Systemic outcomes
- Organizational outputs