LKA_O_3High quality of programmes through knowledge, innovation, results-based management and evaluationView indicators
SP_O_4A
SP O_4.1 : Rating in the Aid Transparency Tracker (Derived from QCPR indicator 25) (Shared with UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4A
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4B
SP O_4.2: Percentage of donor reports submitted on time (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4B
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4C
SP O_4.3: Percentage of feedback received from member states on donor reports that are positive (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4C
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4D
SP O_4.4: Percentage of Country and Multi-Country Offices that have adopted and implemented common service lines in: i.Common procurement services ii. Common finance services iii. Common information, communication and technology (ICT) services iv. Common logistics services v.Common human resources services vi. Common facility services, including Common Premises (Derived from QCPR indicator 76c)(Similar to UNICEF and UNFPA)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4D
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4E
SP O_4.5: Structured dialogue on financing with the Executive Board held annually (Derived from QCPR indicator 19)(Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4E
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4F
SP O_4.6: Percentage of offices which have completed training on anti-fraud and accountability (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4F
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4G
SP O_4.7: Implementation rate for regular resources (Shared with UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4G
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4H
SP O_4.8: Implementation rate for other resources (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4H
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4I
SP O_4.9: Percentage of Country Offices reporting on Greenhouse Gas emissions for travel and operations (Similar to UNFPA and UNICEF) (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4I
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4J
SP O_4.10: Average turnover time for the identification of qualified candidates and complete recruitment (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4J
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4K
SP O_4.11: Percentage of annual performance management and development reviews completed on time (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4K
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4L
SP O_4.12: Percentage of staff members completing mandatory trainings (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4L
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4M
SP O_4.13: Percentage of internal audit recommendations implemented (Similar to UNFPA)
(Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4M
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4N
SP O_4.14: Percentage of external audit recommendations implemented (Similar to UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4N
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4O
SP O_4.15: Percentage of risk units meeting Enterprise Risk Management policy and framework requirements (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4O
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4P
SP O_4.16: Percentage availability and uptime of corporate ICT systems (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4P
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4Q
SP O_4.17: Percentage of ICT platforms that fully address cyber-security issues and architecture design inputs from the ICT team (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4Q
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4R
SP O_4.18: Percentage of offices compliant with business continuity plans and processes (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4R
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_4S
SP O_4.19: Percentage of offices compliant with UN Security Risk Management requirements (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_4S
Country
-
Baseline
--
2018
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_3A
SP O_3.1: Number of initiatives implemented in partnership with the private sector to scale up innovations that address the challenges faced by women and girls (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_3A
Country
-
Baseline
--
2020
Milestone
-
Result
-
2021
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_3B
SP O_3.2: Number of UN-Women offices and units that pilot or scale up digital innovations (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_3B
Country
-
Baseline
--
2020
Milestone
-
Result
-
2021
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_3C
SP O_3.3: Percentage of UN-Women field offices indicating that UN-Women has undertaken activities in the country to support south-south, north-south or triangular cooperation (Derived from QCPR indicator 43d) (Similar to UNICEF)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_3C
Country
2020
Baseline
00
2020
Milestone
-
Result
-
2021
Milestone
-
Result
NA
SP_O_3D
SP O_3.4: Number of countries that have a UN-Women-led national gender equality profile based on gender data sets available, disaggregated by relevant characteristics
2022
Result
-
SP_O_3D
Country
2020
Baseline
00
2020
Milestone
-
Result
-
2021
Milestone
-
Result
NA
SP_O_3E
SP O_3.5: Number of participants trained on gender-equality related topics via the Training Centre, disaggregated by sex and type of organization (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_3E
Country
-
Baseline
--
2020
Milestone
-
Result
-
2021
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_3F
SP O_3.6: Number of thematic communities of practice with systems for capturing, storing and sharing knowledge
2022
Result
-
SP_O_3F
Country
2020
Baseline
00
2020
Milestone
-
Result
-
2021
Milestone
-
Result
NA
SP_O_3G
SP O_3.7: a. Number of citations of UN-Women’s global reports (Progress of the World ‘s Women, World Survey on the Role of Women in Development, SDGs and Gender Report) (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_3G
Country
-
Baseline
--
2020
Milestone
-
Result
-
2021
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_3H
SP O_3.7: b. Number of downloads of UN-Women’s knowledge products (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_3H
Country
-
Baseline
--
2020
Milestone
-
Result
-
2021
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_3I
SP O_3.8: Percentage of Strategic Notes and Annual Reports that meet quality standards in results-based management (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_3I
Country
-
Baseline
--
2020
Milestone
-
Result
-
2021
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_3J
SP O_3.9: Percentage of programme staff trained on results based management (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_3J
Country
-
Baseline
--
2020
Milestone
-
Result
-
2021
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_3K
SP O_3.10: Percentage of planned evaluations being conducted (Similar to UNICEF and UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_3K
Country
-
Baseline
--
2020
Milestone
-
Result
-
2021
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_3L
SP O_3.11: Percentage of evaluations rated “good and above” (Similar to UNICEF and UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_3L
Country
-
Baseline
--
2020
Milestone
-
Result
-
2021
Milestone
-
Result
-
SP_O_1B
Implementation rate for other resources (Desk Review)
2022
Result
-
SP_O_1B
Country
-
Baseline
--
2022
Milestone
-
Result
-
Outputs
LKA_O_3.1UN-Women staff have the capacity and accountability for delivering results in Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment.View indicators
LKA_O_3.1A
Number of staff trained on financial management and accountability systems.
2022
Result
-
LKA_O_3.1A
Country
2017
Baseline
AllAll
2018
Milestone
All
Result
All.
LKA_O_3.3High quality of programmes through knowledge, innovation, results-based management and evaluationView indicators
LKA_O_3.3A
Number of project/programme evaluations the office conducts or participates in.
High quality of programmes through knowledge, innovation, results-based management and evaluation
Alongside standard end-of-project reviews/evaluations, the office sought to understand the impact of past interventions by commissioning an ex-post review of the innovative Multi-Party and Multi-Stakeholder Dialogues on Peacebuilding and Collective Leadership, which was directly implemented by UN Women under the previous PBF-funded project (concluded in 2020). This validated the strategy of the MPDs and provided useful lessons for improving future iterations of such dialogues. The office further employed a range of tools to ensure quality of programmes such as regular coordination meetings with partners and UN agencies, regular updating of risk logs and PMF trackers, alongside good oversight of implementing partners. Additionally, the office invested in documentation of knowledge through publication of various research studies, and compilation of human interest stories and impact stories from project interventions.
High quality of programmes through knowledge, innovation, results-based management and evaluation
The office's commitment to high-quality programming over the years is evidenced by independent reviews/evaluations confirming the effectiveness of various programming models developed by the office - in particular, the women's entrepreneurship and economic empowerment model and the multi-party and multi-stakeholder dialogues (MPDs) on peacebuilding and collective leadership. While evaluation for the latest MPDs is ongoing, the evaluation of the women's economic empowerment model employed in 2022 showed that 96% of respondents have strengthened their resilience and livelihoods through UN Women's programming. The office is poised to scale and up and expand on these innovative models which have provided a wealth of information and lessons learnt for future programming not only in Sri Lanka but in other contexts as well.