Region:Asia PacificCurrent UN Women Plan Period Afghanisthan:2018-2022
World Bank Income Classification:Low IncomeThe World Bank classifies economies for analytical purposes into four income groups: low, lower-middle, upper-middle, and high income. For this purpose it uses gross national income (GNI) per capita data in U.S. dollars, converted from local currency using the World Bank Atlas method, which is applied to smooth exchange rate fluctuations.Least Developed Country:YesSince 1971, the United Nations has recognized LDCs as a category of States that are deemed highly disadvantaged in their development process, for structural, historical and also geographical reasons. Three criteria are used: per capita income, human assets, and economic vulnerability.Gender Inequality Index:0.575GII is a composite metric of gender inequality using three dimensions: reproductive health, empowerment and the labour market. A low GII value indicates low inequality between women and men, and vice-versa.Gender Development Index:0.723GDI measures gender inequalities in achievement in three basic dimensions of human development: health, education, and command over economic resources.
Population:209,497,025Source of population data: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2022). World Population Prospects: The 2022 RevisionMale:19,976,265 (9.5%)Female:189,520,760 (90.5%)
High quality of programs through knowledge, innovation, results-based management and evaluation
Activity DetailsResourcesOutcome Indicators and ResultsStrategic Note Outcome Progress NoteDocuments
Outcome details
SDG alignment
Impact areasProducts, services and processes
Organizational outputs
Policy markerGENDER EQUALITY
Humanitarian scopeNo
UN system functionCapacity development and technical assistanceSupport functions
Outcome Description
High quality of programs through knowledge, innovation, results-based management and evaluation
Resources
$22.00 KPlanned Budget
$0.00Actual Budget
$22.00 KPlanned Budget
Outcome Indicator and ResultsPlan Period :
2019-2022
OUTCOME
LBN_O_3
High quality of programs through knowledge, innovation, results-based management and evaluation
SP_O_3A
SP_O_3A
Country
SP O_3.1: Number of initiatives implemented in partnership with the private sector to scale up innovations that address the challenges faced by women and girls (Not for country reporting)
2022
ResultN/A
SP_O_3A
Country
0
Baseline
--
2019
Milestone
--
Result
--
2020
Milestone
--
Result
--
2021
Target
--
Result
--
SP_O_3B
SP_O_3B
Country
SP O_3.2: Number of UN-Women offices and units that pilot or scale up digital innovations (Not for country reporting)
2022
ResultN/A
SP_O_3B
Country
0
Baseline
--
2019
Milestone
--
Result
--
2020
Milestone
--
Result
--
2021
Target
--
Result
--
SP_O_3C
SP_O_3C
Country
SP O_3.3: Percentage of UN-Women field offices indicating that UN-Women has undertaken activities in the country to support south-south, north-south or triangular cooperation (Derived from QCPR indicator 43d) (Similar to UNICEF)
2022
ResultN/A
SP_O_3C
Country
2020
Baseline
00
2019
Milestone
--
Result
11
2020
Milestone
--
Result
NANA
2021
Target
00
Result
11
SP_O_3D
SP_O_3D
Country
SP O_3.4: Number of countries that have a UN-Women-led national gender equality profile based on gender data sets available, disaggregated by relevant characteristics
2022
ResultN/A
SP_O_3D
Country
2020
Baseline
00
2019
Milestone
--
Result
00
2020
Milestone
--
Result
NANA
2021
Target
11
Result
11
SP_O_3E
SP_O_3E
Country
SP O_3.5: Number of participants trained on gender-equality related topics via the Training Centre, disaggregated by sex and type of organization (Not for country reporting)
2022
ResultN/A
SP_O_3E
Country
2022
Baseline
11
2019
Milestone
--
Result
--
2020
Milestone
--
Result
--
2021
Milestone
--
Result
--
SP_O_3F
SP_O_3F
Country
SP O_3.6: Number of thematic communities of practice with systems for capturing, storing and sharing knowledge
2022
ResultN/A
SP_O_3F
Country
2020
Baseline
00
2019
Milestone
--
Result
00
2020
Milestone
--
Result
NANA
2021
Target
00
Result
NANA
SP_O_3G
SP_O_3G
Country
SP O_3.7: a. Number of citations of UN-Women’s global reports (Progress of the World ‘s Women, World Survey on the Role of Women in Development, SDGs and Gender Report) (Not for country reporting)
QCPR3.5.10
2022
ResultN/A
SP_O_3G
Country
2022
Baseline
yesyes
2019
Milestone
--
Result
--
2020
Milestone
--
Result
--
2021
Milestone
--
Result
--
SP_O_3H
SP_O_3H
Country
SP O_3.7: b. Number of downloads of UN-Women’s knowledge products (Not for country reporting)
2022
ResultN/A
SP_O_3H
Country
0
Baseline
--
2019
Milestone
--
Result
--
2020
Milestone
--
Result
--
2021
Target
--
Result
--
SP_O_3I
SP_O_3I
Country
SP O_3.8: Percentage of Strategic Notes and Annual Reports that meet quality standards in results-based management (Not for country reporting)
2022
ResultN/A
SP_O_3I
Country
0
Baseline
--
2019
Milestone
--
Result
--
2020
Milestone
--
Result
--
2021
Target
--
Result
--
SP_O_3J
SP_O_3J
Country
SP O_3.9: Percentage of programme staff trained on results based management (Not for country reporting)
2022
ResultN/A
SP_O_3J
Country
0
Baseline
--
2019
Milestone
--
Result
--
2020
Milestone
--
Result
--
2021
Target
--
Result
--
SP_O_3K
SP_O_3K
Country
SP O_3.10: Percentage of planned evaluations being conducted (Similar to UNICEF and UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
2022
ResultN/A
SP_O_3K
Country
0
Baseline
--
2019
Milestone
--
Result
--
2020
Milestone
--
Result
--
2021
Target
--
Result
--
SP_O_3L
SP_O_3L
Country
SP O_3.11: Percentage of evaluations rated “good and above” (Similar to UNICEF and UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
2022
ResultN/A
SP_O_3L
Country
0
Baseline
--
2019
Milestone
--
Result
--
2020
Milestone
--
Result
--
2021
Target
--
Result
--
SP_O_5B
UN Women reports on this indicator in a global scope, signified by "(Desk Review)" at the end of the indicator statement (see the Our Global Results page for the global result)
SP_O_5B
Country
Percentage of evaluations rated “good and above” (Desk Review)
UN Women practices RBM for informing programming and decision making
Planned Budget:$726.45 K
Actual Budget and Shortfall:$33.54 K
Expenses:$41.70 K
LBN_O_3.1A
LBN_O_3.1A
Country
30% increase in funds
2022
Result26
LBN_O_3.1A
Country
2017
Baseline
3 million3 million
2019
Milestone
--
Result
Medium 30-69%Medium 30-69%
2020
Milestone
1010
Result
44
2021
Milestone
12 Reports12 Reports
Result
1515
2022
Target
1010
Result
2626
LBN_O_3.1B
LBN_O_3.1B
Country
Number of monitoring field visits conducted to assess the implementation progress of respective programs.
2022
Result0
LBN_O_3.1B
Country
2018
Baseline
66
2019
Milestone
--
Result
High>70%High>70%
2020
Milestone
1515
Result
--
2021
Milestone
20 for 3 programmes20 for 3 programmes
Result
00
2022
Target
77
Result
00
LBN_O_3.1C
LBN_O_3.1C
Country
Timely Quarterly and Annual UNW reporting conducted through RMS
2022
ResultN/A
LBN_O_3.1C
Country
2018
Baseline
33
2019
Milestone
--
Result
High>70%High>70%
2021
Target
15 for 3 programmes15 for 3 programmes
Result
--
OUTPUT
LBN_O_3.3
Lessons learned and recommendations are generated from high quality evaluations of Strategic Note implementation for strategic decision-making and accountability
Planned Budget:$46.09 K
Actual Budget and Shortfall:$0.00
Expenses:$0.00
LBN_O_3.3A
LBN_O_3.3A
Country
MERP tracking matrix updated regularly on a quarterly basis
2022
ResultN/A
LBN_O_3.3A
Country
2018
Baseline
00
2019
Milestone
--
Result
Medium 30-69%Medium 30-69%
2021
Target
3636
Result
--
LBN_O_3.3B
LBN_O_3.3B
Country
Percentage of planned evaluations conducted in the SN portfolio (2019-2021)
2022
Result100
LBN_O_3.3B
Country
2018
Baseline
33
2019
Milestone
--
Result
11
2020
Milestone
--
Result
00
2021
Milestone
66
Result
100%100%
2022
Target
100%100%
Result
100100
LBN_O_3.3C
LBN_O_3.3C
Country
Number of evaluations rated satisfactory or above
2022
ResultN/A
LBN_O_3.3C
Country
2018
Baseline
11
2019
Milestone
--
Result
33
2020
Milestone
--
Result
00
2021
Target
99
Result
--
Disclaimer and notes
The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
References to Kosovo shall be understood to be in the context of United Nations Security Council resolution 1244 (1999).