Skip to main content
  • Summary
  • Resources
  • Results
  • SDGs
  • Funding partners
  • Outcome insights
  • Projects
  • Strategic plan
  • More

    Outcome summary

    Policy marker Gender equalityNot Targeted Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (RMNCH)Not Targeted DesertificationNot Targeted
    UN system function Advocacy, communications and social mobilization Capacity development and technical assistance Comprehensive and disaggregated data (discontinued) Direct support and service delivery Integrated Normative Support (in the context of operational activities) Integrated policy advice and thought leadership Intergovernmental Normative Support Support functions UN system coordination (discontinued)
    Outcome description

    High quality of programmes through knowledge, innovation, results-based management and evaluation

    Outcome resources

    Download data

    Outcome and output results

    Other resources (non-core)
    Country Indexes
    ID Result statement Budget utilisation Progress
    Outcome
    APA_O_3 High quality of programmes through knowledge, innovation, results-based management and evaluation
    View indicators
    SP_O_3F
    SP O_3.6: Number of thematic communities of practice with systems for capturing, storing and sharing knowledge
    2021 Result 10
    -
    Baseline
    --
    2019
    Milestone
    Result
    44
    2020
    Milestone
    Result
    44
    2021
    Milestone
    Result
    1010
    SP_O_3C
    SP O_3.3: Percentage of UN-Women field offices indicating that UN-Women has undertaken activities in the country to support south-south, north-south or triangular cooperation (Derived from QCPR indicator 43d) (Similar to UNICEF)
    2021 Result 100
    -
    Baseline
    --
    2019
    Milestone
    Result
    11
    2020
    Milestone
    Result
    NANA
    2021
    Milestone
    Result
    100100
    SP_O_5B
    Percentage of evaluations rated “good and above” (Desk Review)
    Others OTR
    Result -
    -
    Baseline
    --
    2022
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    SP_O_5F
    Number of (i) joint evaluations; (ii) independent system-wide evaluations (QCPR 5.4.3) (Desk Review)
    QCPR 5.4.3
    Result -
    -
    Baseline
    --
    2022
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    SP_O_3D
    SP O_3.4: Number of countries that have a UN-Women-led national gender equality profile based on gender data sets available, disaggregated by relevant characteristics
    2021 Result NA
    -
    Baseline
    --
    2019
    Milestone
    Result
    NANA
    2020
    Milestone
    Result
    NANA
    2021
    Milestone
    Result
    NANA
    SP_O_3I
    SP O_3.8: Percentage of Strategic Notes and Annual Reports that meet quality standards in results-based management (Not for country reporting)
    2019 Result NA
    -
    Baseline
    --
    2019
    Milestone
    Result
    NANA
    2020
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    2021
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    SP_O_5C
    Percentage all country office, regional office and HQ units' using signature interventions for programming (Desk Review)
    Others OTR
    Result -
    -
    Baseline
    --
    2022
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    SP_O_3J
    SP O_3.9: Percentage of programme staff trained on results based management (Not for country reporting)
    Result -
    -
    Baseline
    --
    2019
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    2020
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    2021
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    SP_O_3A
    SP O_3.1: Number of initiatives implemented in partnership with the private sector to scale up innovations that address the challenges faced by women and girls (Not for country reporting)
    Others OTR
    Result -
    -
    Baseline
    --
    2019
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    2020
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    2021
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    SP_O_3L
    SP O_3.11: Percentage of evaluations rated “good and above” (Similar to UNICEF and UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
    Result -
    -
    Baseline
    --
    2019
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    2020
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    2021
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    SP_O_3K
    SP O_3.10: Percentage of planned evaluations being conducted (Similar to UNICEF and UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
    Result -
    -
    Baseline
    --
    2019
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    2020
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    2021
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    SP_O_3H
    SP O_3.7: b. Number of downloads of UN-Women’s knowledge products (Not for country reporting)
    Result -
    -
    Baseline
    --
    2019
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    2020
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    2021
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    SP_O_3B
    SP O_3.2: Number of UN-Women offices and units that pilot or scale up digital innovations (Not for country reporting)
    Result -
    -
    Baseline
    --
    2019
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    2020
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    2021
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    SP_O_3G
    SP O_3.7: a. Number of citations of UN-Women’s global reports (Progress of the World ‘s Women, World Survey on the Role of Women in Development, SDGs and Gender Report) (Not for country reporting)
    QCPR 3.5.10
    Result -
    -
    Baseline
    --
    2019
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    2020
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    2021
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    SP_O_3E
    SP O_3.5: Number of participants trained on gender-equality related topics via the Training Centre, disaggregated by sex and type of organization (Not for country reporting)
    Result -
    -
    Baseline
    --
    2019
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    2020
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    2021
    Milestone
    Result
    --
    Outputs
    APA_O_3.1 Support and oversight: UN Women field offices and UNCTs access policy advisory services, good practices and innovation to strengthen quality programming for GEEW, with emphasis on Humanitarian/DRR, Climate Change, WEE, governance and WPS, and EVAW
    View indicators
    APA_O_3.1B
    % of programme funds dedicated to strengthening national capacities for RBM
    2022 Result True
    2018
    Baseline
    NoNo
    2019
    Milestone
    YesYes
    Result
    TrueTrue
    2020
    Milestone
    YesYes
    Result
    TrueTrue
    2021
    Milestone
    YesYes
    Result
    TrueTrue
    2022
    Milestone
    YesYes
    Result
    TrueTrue
    APA_O_3.1A
    Level of general satisfaction on quality of support
    2022 Result 7.4
    2018
    Baseline
    7.47.4
    2019
    Milestone
    7.57.5
    Result
    7474
    2020
    Milestone
    7.77.7
    Result
    --
    2021
    Milestone
    88
    Result
    88
    2022
    Milestone
    88
    Result
    7.47.4
    APA_O_3.3 Capacity development and technical assistance: UN Women personnel have greater capacities for GEWE responsive programmes and for programme efficiency
    View indicators
    APA_O_3.3B
    % of programme budget earmarked for evaluation
    2022 Result 4
    2018
    Baseline
    00
    2019
    Milestone
    11
    Result
    11
    2020
    Milestone
    11
    Result
    55
    2021
    Milestone
    33
    Result
    88
    2022
    Milestone
    33
    Result
    44
    APA_O_3.3A
    Rate of management responses to agreed recommendations
    2022 Result 100
    2018
    Baseline
    50%50%
    2019
    Milestone
    55%55%
    Result
    100%100%
    2020
    Milestone
    60%60%
    Result
    100%100%
    2021
    Milestone
    70%70%
    Result
    100%100%
    2022
    Milestone
    70%70%
    Result
    100100
    APA_O_3.3H
    Percentage of projects approved through RPAC
    2022 Result 100
    2018
    Baseline
    100%100%
    2019
    Milestone
    100%100%
    Result
    100%100%
    2020
    Milestone
    100%100%
    Result
    100%100%
    2021
    Milestone
    100%100%
    Result
    100%100%
    2022
    Milestone
    100%100%
    Result
    100100
    APA_O_3.3I
    Number of RBM training (country and regional levels)
    2022 Result 2
    2018
    Baseline
    00
    2019
    Milestone
    11
    Result
    2020
    Milestone
    33
    Result
    33
    2021
    Milestone
    22
    Result
    11
    2022
    Milestone
    11
    Result
    22
    APA_O_3.2 Knowledge management: The work on GEWE in AP Region builds on accurate data and up-to-date researches and knowledge
    View indicators
    APA_O_3.2A
    Number of studies developed by AP-RO on progress towards achievement of the gender equality commitments made normative humanitarian/DRR frameworks such as in the Sendai Framework for DRR and the Grand Bargain
    Others OTR
    2022 Result 2
    2018
    Baseline
    00
    2019
    Milestone
    11
    Result
    --
    2020
    Milestone
    11
    Result
    66
    2021
    Milestone
    11
    Result
    1212
    2022
    Milestone
    22
    Result
    22
    APA_O_3.4 Support and oversight: The RO effectively performs strategic planning, monitoring, reporting and evaluation for the APRO SN
    View indicators
    APA_O_3.4C
    Percentage of baselines and targets available at regional level to follow up implementation and achievement of RO results
    2022 Result 97.81
    2016
    Baseline
    50%50%
    2019
    Milestone
    80%80%
    Result
    95.395.3
    2020
    Milestone
    9090
    Result
    99.399.3
    2021
    Milestone
    100%100%
    Result
    90.590.5
    2022
    Milestone
    Result
    97.8197.81
    APA_O_3.4A
    RO SN 2022-2025 developed with required quality and submitted on time
    2022 Result True
    2018
    Baseline
    n/an/a
    2019
    Milestone
    n/an/a
    Result
    FalseFalse
    2020
    Milestone
    Result
    FalseFalse
    2021
    Milestone
    YesYes
    Result
    FalseFalse
    2022
    Milestone
    YesYes
    Result
    TrueTrue
    APA_O_3.4B
    FGE and UNTF programmes in Asia Pacific successfully implemented through efficient Monitoring and Reporting support from ROAP
    2022 Result ...
    2018
    Baseline
    2525
    2019
    Milestone
    Result
    1919
    2020
    Milestone
    3333
    Result
    33
    2021
    Milestone
    YesYes
    Result
    --
    2022
    Milestone
    Result
    ......
    APA_O_3.4D
    Percentage of outcomes and outputs clusters reports (RO level) submitted on time
    2022 Result 90.07
    2018
    Baseline
    40%40%
    2019
    Milestone
    55%55%
    Result
    40%40%
    2020
    Milestone
    65%65%
    Result
    6969
    2021
    Milestone
    70%70%
    Result
    64.764.7
    2022
    Milestone
    Result
    90.0790.07
    APA_O_3.4E
    Percentage of key actions of the regional strategy completed
    2022 Result 100
    2018
    Baseline
    00
    2019
    Milestone
    20%20%
    Result
    2525
    2020
    Milestone
    Result
    6666
    2021
    Milestone
    100%100%
    Result
    100100
    2022
    Milestone
    Result
    100100
    APA_O_3.5 Support and oversight: COs receive quality and timely policy advice, technical support and quality assurance/oversight for PMR&E, including for contingency planning and emergency planning and response actions
    View indicators
    APA_O_3.5F
    Percentage of planned evaluations being conducted
    2022 Result 87
    2016
    Baseline
    85%85%
    2019
    Milestone
    85%85%
    Result
    6363
    2020
    Milestone
    85%85%
    Result
    9393
    2021
    Milestone
    85%85%
    Result
    100100
    2022
    Milestone
    85%85%
    Result
    8787
    APA_O_3.5A
    Level of the quality improved in monitoring and reporting as a result of support from M&R
    2022 Result 8.5
    2018
    Baseline
    77
    2019
    Milestone
    7.27.2
    Result
    7272
    2020
    Milestone
    7.47.4
    Result
    --
    2021
    Milestone
    7.57.5
    Result
    88
    2022
    Milestone
    7.57.5
    Result
    8.58.5
    APA_O_3.5B
    Level of satisfaction on quality of support for evaluation
    2022 Result 7.5
    2018
    Baseline
    7.17.1
    2019
    Milestone
    7.27.2
    Result
    7171
    2020
    Milestone
    7.37.3
    Result
    --
    2021
    Milestone
    7.57.5
    Result
    88
    2022
    Milestone
    7.57.5
    Result
    7.57.5
    APA_O_3.5C
    Percentage of donor reports submitted by COs on time
    2022 Result 97.5
    2018
    Baseline
    71%71%
    2019
    Milestone
    75%75%
    Result
    8787
    2020
    Milestone
    80%80%
    Result
    87.287.2
    2021
    Milestone
    83%83%
    Result
    94.5%94.5%
    2022
    Milestone
    83%83%
    Result
    97.597.5
    APA_O_3.5D
    Percentage of reports which are results oriented
    2022 Result 100
    2018
    Baseline
    80%80%
    2019
    Milestone
    85%85%
    Result
    78.1%78.1%
    2020
    Milestone
    90%90%
    Result
    8585
    2021
    Milestone
    95%95%
    Result
    95.295.2
    2022
    Milestone
    95%95%
    Result
    100100
    APA_O_3.5G
    Percentage of evaluations rated "satisfactory and above"
    2022 Result 100
    2018
    Baseline
    100%100%
    2019
    Milestone
    100%100%
    Result
    5050
    2020
    Milestone
    100%100%
    Result
    100100
    2021
    Milestone
    100%100%
    Result
    100100
    2022
    Milestone
    100%100%
    Result
    100100
    APA_O_3.5H
    Increased coverage of evaluations (minimum one Country Portfolio Evaluation per SN cycle)
    2022 Result 100
    2018
    Baseline
    0%0%
    2019
    Milestone
    15%15%
    Result
    1616
    2020
    Milestone
    22%22%
    Result
    8383
    2021
    Milestone
    80%80%
    Result
    100100
    2022
    Milestone
    80%80%
    Result
    100100
    APA_O_3.5E
    Percentage of country offices that have quality MERP
    2022 Result 100
    2017
    Baseline
    60%60%
    2019
    Milestone
    70%70%
    Result
    7575
    2020
    Milestone
    80%80%
    Result
    8181
    2021
    Milestone
    90%90%
    Result
    100100
    2022
    Milestone
    90%90%
    Result
    100100
    APA_O_3.6 Support and oversight: Gender in Humanitarian Actions including preparedness and SURGE support is available to the UN Women country offices and UNCT, if required
    View indicators
    APA_O_3.6A
    Number of humanitarian surge missions supported in the region
    2022 Result 3
    2018
    Baseline
    44
    2019
    Milestone
    22
    Result
    --
    2020
    Milestone
    22
    Result
    99
    2021
    Milestone
    33
    Result
    44
    2022
    Milestone
    33
    Result
    33
    APA_O_3.6B
    Number of country offices that report increased action on GE in humanitarian response, prevention and preparedness following the RO’s support
    2022 Result 6
    2017
    Baseline
    00
    2019
    Milestone
    33
    Result
    55
    2020
    Milestone
    33
    Result
    88
    2021
    Milestone
    55
    Result
    1010
    2022
    Milestone
    55
    Result
    66
    Download data

    Outcome resources allocated towards SDGs

    View SDG data for

    Download data

    Our funding partners contributions

    Regular resources (core)

    Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.

    $0.00 in total
    Other resources (non-core)
    $0.00 in total
    No data found
    Download data

    Outcome insights and achievements

    Outcome progress note for the year

    High quality of programmes through knowledge, innovation, results-based management and evaluation

    The three new SNs (Bangladesh, Vietnam and Timor Leste) align with the respective country priorities and corporate standards including RBM and lessons learnt from evaluations. AWPs of Afghanistan and Myanmar was promptly adjusted to reflect the complex crisis contexts and strategic positioning of the COs in the UNCTs and the broader development partner communities. All the 2022 BWP/AWPs in the region align with their respective SN and the new Strategic Plan. The 2022 RO AWP reflects the needs of CO/PPs that were identified by the MTR survey and periodic consultations such as monthly reps meetings. All of them have met the corporate quality standard (indicator AP_O_3.3A) Innovations and knowledge management were embedded in SN/AWPs and projects. They were scrutinized during the appraisals and implementations were supported by the RO thematic leads. In 2021, knowledge was shared among offices in the region through 10 Communities of Practice in various thematic or functional areas, which included gender statistics, humanitarian, migration, communications (indicator SP_O_3F) to enhance the quality and soundness of programming. In addition, about 100 knowledge exchange actions took place as a form of S outh-south and triangular cooperation that included regional climate resilience and DRR events, regional conference on climate week, GiHA, and six Generation Equality Asia-Pacific Regional Multi-Stakeholder dialogues (indicator SP_O_3C). Constant improvements and risk mitigations were made to the implementation of the RO AWP and projects by carrying out solid and continuous monitoring. Monitoring was well thought out, planned and budgeted in advance through MERPs or project monitoring plans/result frameworks. All of the MERPs in the region met the required standard (indicator AP_O_3.5E). High quality reporting was also achieved: 95.2% of the donor reports of the region was rated as meeting RBM requirements (indicator AP_O_3.5D), and 92% of the reports were submitted in time (indicator AP_O_3.5C). Thirteen evaluations conducted during 2021 confirmed high quality design and implementation and achieved results of programmes/projects. The evaluations were rated as “good” or “very good” rating (3 are pending the rating as of early January) (indicator AP_O_3.5G) . The recommendations and generated lessons learnt from the evaluations were applied to designing of the RO AWP and new projects.

    High quality of programmes through knowledge, innovation, results-based management and evaluation

    The three new SNs (Bangladesh, Vietnam and Timor Leste) align with the respective country priorities and corporate standards including RBM and lessons learnt from evaluations. AWPs of Afghanistan and Myanmar was promptly adjusted to reflect the complex crisis contexts and strategic positioning of the COs in the UNCTs and the broader development partner communities. All the 2022 BWP/AWPs in the region align with their respective SN and the new Strategic Plan. The 2022 RO AWP reflects the needs of CO/PPs that were identified by the MTR survey and periodic consultations such as monthly reps meetings. All of them have met the corporate quality standard (indicator AP_O_3.3A) Innovations and knowledge management were embedded in SN/AWPs and projects. They were scrutinized during the appraisals and implementations were supported by the RO thematic leads. In 2021, knowledge was shared among offices in the region through 10 Communities of Practice in various thematic or functional areas, which included gender statistics, humanitarian, migration, communications (indicator SP_O_3F) to enhance the quality and soundness of programming. In addition, about 100 knowledge exchange actions took place as a form of S outh-south and triangular cooperation that included regional climate resilience and DRR events, regional conference on climate week, GiHA, and six Generation Equality Asia-Pacific Regional Multi-Stakeholder dialogues (indicator SP_O_3C). Constant improvements and risk mitigations were made to the implementation of the RO AWP and projects by carrying out solid and continuous monitoring. Monitoring was well thought out, planned and budgeted in advance through MERPs or project monitoring plans/result frameworks. All of the MERPs in the region met the required standard (indicator AP_O_3.5E). High quality reporting was also achieved: 95.2% of the donor reports of the region was rated as meeting RBM requirements (indicator AP_O_3.5D), and 92% of the reports were submitted in time (indicator AP_O_3.5C). Thirteen evaluations conducted during 2021 confirmed high quality design and implementation and achieved results of programmes/projects. The evaluations were rated as “good” or “very good” rating (3 are pending the rating as of early January) (indicator AP_O_3.5G) . The recommendations and generated lessons learnt from the evaluations were applied to designing of the RO AWP and new projects.

    High quality of programmes through knowledge, innovation, results-based management and evaluation

    The ROAP Strategic Note and Strategic Notes for Nepal and Pakistan developed with RO support in 2023 were aligned with the global SN and respective UNSDCFs and met corporate quality standards (indicator AP_0_3.3A). All of the three SNs included learning from evaluation with the RO SN in particular integrating lessons learned from the MTR of the previous SN and responding to feedback from Country Offices to ensure enhanced support to country presences in alignment with the corporate ‘pivot to the field’. All BWP and AWP developed for 2023 are aligned with relevant Strategic Notes, national priorities and UNSDCF frameworks. Monitoring for continuous improvement of programme quality was undertaken methodically across the region in line with the approved MERPs, all of which met required quality standards. At regional level 134 of 137 indicators (97.81%) had baselines and targets required for monitoring. With travel becoming possible in most of the region in the course of 2022, the RO was able to resume hands-on support to Country Offices, with a particular focus on those experiencing crises and transitions. In particular, in recognition of the complex crisis in Afghanistan, nine RO personnel provided dedicated support to Afghanistan CO, with six travelling to work in Kabul and two supporting remotely. Two colleagues were deployed to Pakistan to support engagement in humanitarian assessment and response in the immediate aftermath of catastrophic floods. Members of the Myanmar Country Office team have been supported to work from Bangkok during 2022. The new ROAP SN builds in a focus on deployability across the RO, recognizing the increased prevalence of crises and the opportunities for UN Women to engage more deeply in crisis preparedness and response leveraging membership of the IASC. Over one hundred UN Women personnel from around the region benefited from a significant opportunity to build capacity in through a week-long programme co-organised with HQ Units in Bangkok and which included project management certification along-side HR, Finance, procurement, risk assessment and security training modules. Fourteen of the 16 evaluations or 87% of those planned in the region in 2023 were completed or in-progress by the end of the year (Indicator APA_0_3.5F) and in terms of quality 100% of evaluations were rated as “good” or “very good”. One additional CPE was undertaken in 2022 by Nepal, bring the total of CPEs undertaken since 2019 to six, noting that the CPE planned for Afghanistan was postponed in the light of the crisis situation and consequent pivoting of the country programme undertaken since the Taliban takeover in August 2021.

    Strategic plan contributions

    Budget
    Expenses
    Download data
    Budget
    Expenses
    Download data
    Budget
    Expenses
    Download data
    User guide Back to top