Skip to main content
Region:Asia Pacific Current UN Women Plan Period Afghanisthan:2018-2022
i-icon World Bank Income Classification:Low Income The World Bank classifies economies for analytical purposes into four income groups: low, lower-middle, upper-middle, and high income. For this purpose it uses gross national income (GNI) per capita data in U.S. dollars, converted from local currency using the World Bank Atlas method, which is applied to smooth exchange rate fluctuations. i-icon Least Developed Country:Yes Since 1971, the United Nations has recognized LDCs as a category of States that are deemed highly disadvantaged in their development process, for structural, historical and also geographical reasons. Three criteria are used: per capita income, human assets, and economic vulnerability. i-icon Gender Inequality Index:0.575 GII is a composite metric of gender inequality using three dimensions: reproductive health, empowerment and the labour market. A low GII value indicates low inequality between women and men, and vice-versa. i-icon Gender Development Index:0.723 GDI measures gender inequalities in achievement in three basic dimensions of human development: health, education, and command over economic resources.
i-icon Population:209,497,025 Source of population data: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2022). World Population Prospects: The 2022 Revision Male:19,976,265 (9.5%) Female:189,520,760 (90.5%)
Map Summary
Summary
Disclaimer
Country
Year
OVERVIEWRESULTS & RESOURCESOUR PROGRESSSTRATEGIC PLAN CONTRIBUTIONS
return-to-previous
outcome MDA_O_3XM-DAC-41146-MDA_O_3

High quality programmes

Activity Details Resources Outcome Indicators and Results Strategic Note Outcome Progress Note Documents
Outcome details
SDG alignment
Impact areas
Impact areas
Business transformation
Organizational outputs
Policy marker GENDER EQUALITY
Humanitarian scope No
UN system function Comprehensive and disaggregated data (discontinued) Support functions
Outcome Description

High quality of programmes through knowledge, innovation, results-based management and evaluation

Resources
$26.73 K Planned Budget
$26.73 K Actual Budget
$26.73 K Planned Budget
$26.73 K Actual Budget and Shortfall
$29.06 K Expenses
Funding Partners Regular Resources (Core):
UN_Women_English
UN Women $13,733
Other Resources (Non-Core)/ Funding Partners:
SWE
Sweden $13,000
Total Other Resources (Non-Core) $13,000
Outcome Indicator and Results Plan Period : 2018-2022
OUTCOME MDA_O_3

High quality programmes

SP_O_3A
SP_O_3A
Country
SP O_3.1: Number of initiatives implemented in partnership with the private sector to scale up innovations that address the challenges faced by women and girls (Not for country reporting)
2022 Result N/A
SP_O_3A
Country
2017
Baseline
0 0
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2019
Milestone
0 0
Result
- -
2020
Milestone
1 1
Result
- -
2021
Target
- -
Result
- -
SP_O_3B
SP_O_3B
Country
SP O_3.2: Number of UN-Women offices and units that pilot or scale up digital innovations (Not for country reporting)
2022 Result N/A
SP_O_3B
Country
2017
Baseline
0 0
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2019
Milestone
0 0
Result
- -
2020
Milestone
no no
Result
- -
2021
Target
- -
Result
- -
SP_O_3C
SP_O_3C
Country
SP O_3.3: Percentage of UN-Women field offices indicating that UN-Women has undertaken activities in the country to support south-south, north-south or triangular cooperation (Derived from QCPR indicator 43d) (Similar to UNICEF)
2022 Result N/A
SP_O_3C
Country
2020
Baseline
yes yes
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2019
Milestone
no no
Result
2 2
2020
Milestone
yes yes
Result
1 1
2021
Target
yes yes
Result
2 2
SP_O_3D
SP_O_3D
Country
SP O_3.4: Number of countries that have a UN-Women-led national gender equality profile based on gender data sets available, disaggregated by relevant characteristics
2022 Result N/A
SP_O_3D
Country
2017
Baseline
no no
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2019
Milestone
no no
Result
0 0
2020
Milestone
yes yes
Result
0 0
2021
Target
yes yes
Result
1 1
SP_O_3E
SP_O_3E
Country
SP O_3.5: Number of participants trained on gender-equality related topics via the Training Centre, disaggregated by sex and type of organization (Not for country reporting)
2022 Result 0
SP_O_3E
Country
0
Baseline
- -
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2019
Milestone
0 0
Result
- -
2020
Milestone
10 10
Result
- -
2021
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2022
Milestone
- -
Result
0 0
2023
Target
- -
Result
- -
SP_O_3F
SP_O_3F
Country
SP O_3.6: Number of thematic communities of practice with systems for capturing, storing and sharing knowledge
2022 Result N/A
SP_O_3F
Country
2017
Baseline
0 0
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2019
Milestone
1 1
Result
0 0
2020
Milestone
1 1
Result
1 1
2021
Target
1 1
Result
NA NA
SP_O_3G
SP_O_3G
Country
SP O_3.7: a. Number of citations of UN-Women’s global reports (Progress of the World ‘s Women, World Survey on the Role of Women in Development, SDGs and Gender Report) (Not for country reporting)
2022 Result N/A
SP_O_3G
Country
2017
Baseline
0 0
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2019
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2020
Milestone
no no
Result
- -
2021
Target
- -
Result
- -
SP_O_3H
SP_O_3H
Country
SP O_3.7: b. Number of downloads of UN-Women’s knowledge products (Not for country reporting)
2022 Result N/A
SP_O_3H
Country
2020
Baseline
0 0
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2019
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2020
Milestone
no no
Result
- -
2021
Target
- -
Result
- -
SP_O_3I
SP_O_3I
Country
SP O_3.8: Percentage of Strategic Notes and Annual Reports that meet quality standards in results-based management (Not for country reporting)
2022 Result N/A
SP_O_3I
Country
2020
Baseline
0 0
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2019
Milestone
- -
Result
NA NA
2020
Milestone
no no
Result
- -
2021
Target
- -
Result
- -
SP_O_3J
SP_O_3J
Country
SP O_3.9: Percentage of programme staff trained on results based management (Not for country reporting)
2022 Result N/A
SP_O_3J
Country
2020
Baseline
70% 70%
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2019
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2020
Milestone
80% 80%
Result
- -
2021
Target
- -
Result
- -
SP_O_3K
SP_O_3K
Country
SP O_3.10: Percentage of planned evaluations being conducted (Similar to UNICEF and UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
2022 Result N/A
SP_O_3K
Country
2020
Baseline
0 0
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2019
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2020
Milestone
no no
Result
- -
2021
Target
- -
Result
- -
SP_O_3L
SP_O_3L
Country
SP O_3.11: Percentage of evaluations rated “good and above” (Similar to UNICEF and UNFPA) (Not for country reporting)
2022 Result N/A
SP_O_3L
Country
2020
Baseline
0 0
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2019
Milestone
- -
Result
- -
2020
Milestone
no no
Result
- -
2021
Target
- -
Result
- -
Click here to view the progress
Output Indicator and Results
OUTPUT MDA_O_3.1

High quality of programmes through knowledge, innovation, results-based management and evaluation

Planned Budget: $1.05 M
Actual Budget and Shortfall: $177.70 K
Expenses: $191.76 K
MDA_O_3.1A
MDA_O_3.1A
Country
Proportion of nationalized SDG indicators that are produced and available with full sex- disaggregated baseline and monitoring data relevant to the national target, since 2017
2022 Result 36.4
MDA_O_3.1A
Country
2017
Baseline
57 57
2018
Milestone
60 60
Result
2019
Milestone
65 65
Result
60 60
2020
Milestone
70 70
Result
36 36
2021
Milestone
75 75
Result
36.4 36.4
2022
Target
80 80
Result
36.4 36.4
MDA_O_3.1B
MDA_O_3.1B
Country
Number of knowledge products developed and disseminated in line with UN Women quality assurance standards.
2022 Result N/A
MDA_O_3.1B
Country
2021
Baseline
61 61
MDA_O_3.1C
MDA_O_3.1C
Country
Number of completed good quality evaluations managed by CO
2022 Result 1
MDA_O_3.1C
Country
2017
Baseline
1 1
2018
Milestone
- -
Result
High>70% High>70%
2019
Milestone
- -
Result
Low 0-29 % Low 0-29 %
2020
Milestone
0 0
Result
0 0
2021
Milestone
- -
Result
0 0
2022
Target
2 (since 2017) 2 (since 2017)
Result
1 1
MDA_O_3.1D
MDA_O_3.1D
Country
Percentage of the CO’s programme budget (core and non-core) earmarked for evaluation
2022 Result 0.9
MDA_O_3.1D
Country
2017
Baseline
2.30% 2.30%
2018
Milestone
1.20% 1.20%
Result
2019
Milestone
- -
Result
1.5 1.5
2020
Milestone
1% 1%
Result
1.6 1.6
2021
Milestone
- -
Result
1.07 1.07
2022
Target
3.50% 3.50%
Result
0.9 0.9
MDA_O_3.1E
MDA_O_3.1E
Country
Rate of management responses to agreed recommendations developed and timely uploaded in the GATE system
2022 Result 100
MDA_O_3.1E
Country
2017
Baseline
100% 100%
2018
Milestone
100% 100%
Result
2019
Milestone
100% 100%
Result
100 100
2020
Milestone
100% 100%
Result
100 100
2021
Milestone
100% 100%
Result
0 0
2022
Target
100% 100%
Result
100 100
MDA_O_3.1F
MDA_O_3.1F
Country
Number of knowledge products developed.
2022 Result 23
MDA_O_3.1F
Country
2020
Baseline
20 20
2021
Milestone
15+ 15+
Result
61 61
2022
Target
- -
Result
23 23
Documents
Title
Categories
Download
Strategic Note (SN) Development Results and Resources Framework
Download
Disclaimer and notes
The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
References to Kosovo shall be understood to be in the context of United Nations Security Council resolution 1244 (1999).
Download Data
CSV PDF
Feedback

We are trying to make this portal very useful and would really love your input. Could you take a few minutes to answer a few questions?

We really appreciate you sharing your feedback

Form

User survey – Welcome to the conversation!

Here at UN Women, we are passionate about making the Transparency Portal not just a tool, but a resource that truly resonates with your needs. This is where you come in! Your insights and experiences are the compass that guides its future development.

Could we borrow a moment of your time? Just a few minutes to dive into a couple of questions could make a world of difference. And – let us know what ideas you have for the Transparency Portal. Which features spark your interest? What improvements are you craving to see?

Your voice is crucial in this journey of growth and improvement. Thank you for being a pivotal part of our community. We are all ears and cannot wait to hear your thoughts and suggestions!

What type of institution do you identify with? Please select one.
Question 01